| Home » Categories » Solutions by Business Process » E-Business » XML |
Application Considerations - Faxed/Phoned Orders |
|
Article Number: 1851 | Rating: Unrated | Last Updated: Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 4:45 PM
|
|
Datafile Software Application Considerations - Faxed/Phoned Orders Life is very straightforward if XML invoices are returned that match to an originating XML order. Sometimes, however, it may be expedient to phone or fax an order — perhaps because a special price has been negotiated, and an electronic order won’t result in the negotiated price being used. The invoice will, however, be returned by XML. The issue is: how is the Datafile XML processor will be able to match the invoice and its lines to the original order? The normal way is to send the POD prime index with every detail line on the order, and for that to be returned by the supplier in the invoice line. Even if the supplier is prepared to take a verbal or phoned line reference, there is a difficulty if this reference is entered incorrectly. In a typical Datafile system, the POD prime index might have a value such as (say) 018457 /0001. A computer will remember how many spaces there are in that reference. But an operator is highly likely to get that wrong. In the example given there are four spaces, because the order number is a ten-character field. The solution is to amend database definitions so that the order reference field in both the POH and the POD are the same length as your order number, typically six. Then the POD prime index takes the form 018457/0001 with no intervening spaces. |
Attachments
There are no attachments for this article.
|
P/L XML CrNotes Input
Viewed 2012 times since Mon, Jul 9, 2012
clear
Viewed 1940 times since Mon, Jul 9, 2012
Example of XML Document
Viewed 2552 times since Tue, Jul 10, 2012
Purchase Ledger Transactions
Viewed 2009 times since Tue, Jul 10, 2012
time
Viewed 1902 times since Mon, Jul 9, 2012
increment
Viewed 2193 times since Mon, Jul 9, 2012
Template Attributes
Viewed 2052 times since Mon, Jul 9, 2012
Comments
Viewed 1993 times since Mon, Jul 9, 2012
repeat
Viewed 1940 times since Mon, Jul 9, 2012
Tables Distributed
Viewed 2133 times since Tue, Jul 10, 2012
|

